tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5418994588621362010.post1590066240110353016..comments2023-11-15T10:08:56.796-08:00Comments on the blog formerly known as The Statistical Mechanic: interpretations, part 1/4Wolfganghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07086991199438418163noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5418994588621362010.post-30900811609927402032010-02-28T07:26:16.011-08:002010-02-28T07:26:16.011-08:00I am the Neil B. mentioned above re Chad's pos...I am the Neil B. mentioned above re Chad's post. For the record, before I move on to Part 4/4:<br>1. Chad responded directly to a blog post of mine, not a comment at his blog (altho I have commented before on that at his UP.)<br>2. Chad had to retract his claim that my math was wrong.<br>3. I recommend checking over my proposal directly, from my name link.Neil Bhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04564859009749481136noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5418994588621362010.post-18138011843613691662010-02-13T10:30:56.269-08:002010-02-13T10:30:56.269-08:00I think proposals that W and R do not (have to) ma...I think proposals that W and R do not (have to) match fall into category 2) which I will praise in part 3/4.wolfganghttp://tsm2.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5418994588621362010.post-47358335327319803162010-02-13T09:39:11.504-08:002010-02-13T09:39:11.504-08:004) The problem is assuming W and R must match up ...4) The problem is assuming W and R must match up in the first place. W is a theory, R is a reality. W is imaginary, R is real. W has a vanishingly small percentage of the world's population agreeing on it, R has all but the deaf agreeing on it.Chrisnoreply@blogger.com