tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5418994588621362010.post8935916859576240070..comments2023-11-15T10:08:56.796-08:00Comments on the blog formerly known as The Statistical Mechanic: the isle of ElbaWolfganghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07086991199438418163noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5418994588621362010.post-62277715997778661792011-12-23T12:29:42.895-08:002011-12-23T12:29:42.895-08:00'real collapse' is problematic too, so thi...'real collapse' is problematic too, so this may leave the frequentist with 'shut up and continue to think about it some more' for now 8-)wolfgangnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5418994588621362010.post-67804683775888764772011-12-23T11:58:54.589-08:002011-12-23T11:58:54.589-08:00Fair enough! So which way should the frequentist t...Fair enough! So which way should the frequentist tend between 'shut up and calculate' and 'the wave function really collapses'? Or no necessary preference?5371noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5418994588621362010.post-21961210076017783092011-12-23T08:52:44.137-08:002011-12-23T08:52:44.137-08:00I am not sure a frequentist would like outcomes (w...I am not sure a frequentist would like outcomes (worlds) which cannot be counted (and if one performs a [naive] counting the results are wrong on top of it) ...wolfgangnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5418994588621362010.post-15736954910266368582011-12-22T14:06:28.385-08:002011-12-22T14:06:28.385-08:00Shouldn't a frequentist lean towards many-worl...Shouldn't a frequentist lean towards many-worldery?5371noreply@blogger.com